The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Alex ShihTalk 19:51, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
New enough and long enough. Article is well-written and well cited. QPQ checks. Source cites pages 256 and 257 of a book - google preview is only giving me page 256 but based on the content in that page I have no doubts the hook is backed up on the following one. Good to go.
Freikorp (
talk) 01:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Alex ShihTalk 19:51, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
New enough and long enough. Article is well-written and well cited. QPQ checks. Source cites pages 256 and 257 of a book - google preview is only giving me page 256 but based on the content in that page I have no doubts the hook is backed up on the following one. Good to go.
Freikorp (
talk) 01:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)