The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 07:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Created by
HaEr48 (
talk). Self-nominated at 05:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC).
Comment: Interesting article, but really needs a native speaker to run through the prose. Also it needs to be clearer that the pic is some sort of print reproduction from 1907, no doubt based on a photo, but not one itself.
Johnbod (
talk) 02:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC) -->
Thanks,
Johnbod. I replaced the image with the photo of the actual thing, thanks for pointing out that the previous one's a reproduction! Regarding the prose, I will see what I can do, and I also submitted
a request to
WP:COPYEDITORS.
HaEr48 (
talk) 19:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
• Some issues found.
✓ This article is new and was created on 04:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4841 characters
✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (14.5% confidence;
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
Thanks bot :) To clarify for reviewers. the 300-character count include all the wikilnk characters. Just the plain text and without the (pictured), it is 149 characters only.
HaEr48 (
talk) 23:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyediting is done (thanks
Corinne!). Can we look at this nomination again?
HaEr48 (
talk) 04:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
QPQ was done. Hook is confirmed in he reference. Article is big enough. new enough when nominated, correct person credited. English is copyedited enough to understand, though I did try to make one point clear. It is completely referenced with suitable sources, and is neutral. Copyviotool can't find a problem. The hook is in the article, cited and supported by the reference. Good to go now.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 07:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 07:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Created by
HaEr48 (
talk). Self-nominated at 05:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC).
Comment: Interesting article, but really needs a native speaker to run through the prose. Also it needs to be clearer that the pic is some sort of print reproduction from 1907, no doubt based on a photo, but not one itself.
Johnbod (
talk) 02:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC) -->
Thanks,
Johnbod. I replaced the image with the photo of the actual thing, thanks for pointing out that the previous one's a reproduction! Regarding the prose, I will see what I can do, and I also submitted
a request to
WP:COPYEDITORS.
HaEr48 (
talk) 19:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
• Some issues found.
✓ This article is new and was created on 04:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4841 characters
✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (14.5% confidence;
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
Thanks bot :) To clarify for reviewers. the 300-character count include all the wikilnk characters. Just the plain text and without the (pictured), it is 149 characters only.
HaEr48 (
talk) 23:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyediting is done (thanks
Corinne!). Can we look at this nomination again?
HaEr48 (
talk) 04:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
QPQ was done. Hook is confirmed in he reference. Article is big enough. new enough when nominated, correct person credited. English is copyedited enough to understand, though I did try to make one point clear. It is completely referenced with suitable sources, and is neutral. Copyviotool can't find a problem. The hook is in the article, cited and supported by the reference. Good to go now.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 07:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)