The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Created/expanded by Chetsford ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image eligibility:
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
See below.
The phrase "RM Asia funneled subcontracts paid for by the government" garners nine non-WP hits in Google search. I am left with the feeling that there may be more such if I checked further. Also, the hook is sourced, but comprehension is dependent upon a footnote at bottom of article. I do not know of a WP consensus that covers this eventuality; however, I regard it as unsatisfactory. While it may be fair to baffle the reader to draw attention, it's not fair to let them still be baffled after reading the article, or require them to search for a footnote. Georgejdorner ( talk) 03:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Created/expanded by Chetsford ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image eligibility:
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
See below.
The phrase "RM Asia funneled subcontracts paid for by the government" garners nine non-WP hits in Google search. I am left with the feeling that there may be more such if I checked further. Also, the hook is sourced, but comprehension is dependent upon a footnote at bottom of article. I do not know of a WP consensus that covers this eventuality; however, I regard it as unsatisfactory. While it may be fair to baffle the reader to draw attention, it's not fair to let them still be baffled after reading the article, or require them to search for a footnote. Georgejdorner ( talk) 03:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)