The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
HalfGigtalk 14:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
... that during Operation Python, oil reserves, ammunition warehouses and workshops, worth $3 billion were destroyed by the
Indian Navy? Source:
BR Archive
ALT1:... that aftermath Operation Python, Pakistani ships have been ordered to reduce their ammunition dumps so as to reduce the explosion damage, if hit? Source:
R&I
Improved to Good Article status by
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk). Self-nominated at 10:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC).
Recent GA. The article and hook are referenced. The first hook is more interesting and the second is a bit too confusing, in my opinion. No copyright or neutrality issue detected. QPQ is done. Good to go.--
KAVEBEAR (
talk) 23:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
HalfGigtalk 14:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
... that during Operation Python, oil reserves, ammunition warehouses and workshops, worth $3 billion were destroyed by the
Indian Navy? Source:
BR Archive
ALT1:... that aftermath Operation Python, Pakistani ships have been ordered to reduce their ammunition dumps so as to reduce the explosion damage, if hit? Source:
R&I
Improved to Good Article status by
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk). Self-nominated at 10:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC).
Recent GA. The article and hook are referenced. The first hook is more interesting and the second is a bit too confusing, in my opinion. No copyright or neutrality issue detected. QPQ is done. Good to go.--
KAVEBEAR (
talk) 23:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)