The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 06:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by
Jaguar (
talk). Self-nominated at 17:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC).
I don't believe in adverbs, so I removed one. It's a GA (it passed, in the shortest GA review I've ever seen, though
ProtoDrake forgot to add it to the list), and the hook is verified. Note that I removed an image; see edit summary for reason.
Dr Aaij (
talk) 02:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. It went through quite a vigorous FAC prior to the GA review so the article is already well refined. Being verbose is one of my downfalls, sadly. JAGUAR 10:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm happy with this hook, let's go for it. JAGUAR 21:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
New reviewer needed to check ALT1 hook.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 16:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
ReviewALT 1 supported by in line citations to
WP:RS. Hook is neutral and moderately interesting (for those who care about that sort of thing – gaming esoterica is outside my ken). QPQ confirmed. Promoted to GA.
Earwig is clear. No apparent close paraphrasing or copy vio. Timely nominated. GTG. 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 12:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 06:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by
Jaguar (
talk). Self-nominated at 17:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC).
I don't believe in adverbs, so I removed one. It's a GA (it passed, in the shortest GA review I've ever seen, though
ProtoDrake forgot to add it to the list), and the hook is verified. Note that I removed an image; see edit summary for reason.
Dr Aaij (
talk) 02:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. It went through quite a vigorous FAC prior to the GA review so the article is already well refined. Being verbose is one of my downfalls, sadly. JAGUAR 10:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm happy with this hook, let's go for it. JAGUAR 21:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
New reviewer needed to check ALT1 hook.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 16:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
ReviewALT 1 supported by in line citations to
WP:RS. Hook is neutral and moderately interesting (for those who care about that sort of thing – gaming esoterica is outside my ken). QPQ confirmed. Promoted to GA.
Earwig is clear. No apparent close paraphrasing or copy vio. Timely nominated. GTG. 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 12:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)