The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 17:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The Article is long enough and new enough for DYK. The hook is referenced. There are a couple of redlinks in the text and in the references which might want to be fixed but that's just me. Copyvio looks ok. The dedication looks out of place in bold text but again that's just me. Hook length short enough. 4 nominations on QPQ tool.
☕ Antiqueighthaver 19:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 17:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The Article is long enough and new enough for DYK. The hook is referenced. There are a couple of redlinks in the text and in the references which might want to be fixed but that's just me. Copyvio looks ok. The dedication looks out of place in bold text but again that's just me. Hook length short enough. 4 nominations on QPQ tool.
☕ Antiqueighthaver 19:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)