The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by
AirshipJungleman29talk 18:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, I know you put a lot of work into this, but I'm leaning firmly towards oppose. There are significant
WP:NPOV and slight
WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH issues with the article (please read both of these links carefully). Quotes like "vibrant assembly", "reimagined the nomenclature", "With the passage of time, it became apparent that one day was not enough to celebrate St. Nicholas", and "People of all ages come together to joyously celebrate" are overly flowery, and sometimes unsourced.
It's not just in a few places, it's in almost every paragraph of the article. Addressing these issues would involve a significant rewrite, and also a change in your writing style entirely, which is not easy. I recommend the nomination be closed. I see it's also nominated for good article; as a heads up, reviewers will likely have the same feedback, and possibly quick fail it. Consider asking someone for tips on how to rework it, then renominating for good article, then doing a DYK after it passes. Hope this feedback is helpful, all the best.
toobigtokale (
talk) 04:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
For this and future articles, some style links you should read:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by
AirshipJungleman29talk 18:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, I know you put a lot of work into this, but I'm leaning firmly towards oppose. There are significant
WP:NPOV and slight
WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH issues with the article (please read both of these links carefully). Quotes like "vibrant assembly", "reimagined the nomenclature", "With the passage of time, it became apparent that one day was not enough to celebrate St. Nicholas", and "People of all ages come together to joyously celebrate" are overly flowery, and sometimes unsourced.
It's not just in a few places, it's in almost every paragraph of the article. Addressing these issues would involve a significant rewrite, and also a change in your writing style entirely, which is not easy. I recommend the nomination be closed. I see it's also nominated for good article; as a heads up, reviewers will likely have the same feedback, and possibly quick fail it. Consider asking someone for tips on how to rework it, then renominating for good article, then doing a DYK after it passes. Hope this feedback is helpful, all the best.
toobigtokale (
talk) 04:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
For this and future articles, some style links you should read: