The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 11:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk). Self nominated at 19:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough and within policy. Hook is properly formatted, interesting and within policy, although I'm not sure if "that were armed with" is necessary. Why not just "...to be launched with guns larger than..."? QPQ has been competed and image is within policy. Looks good to go.
Dana boomer (
talk) 18:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
I like your phrasing better.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk) 18:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 11:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk). Self nominated at 19:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough and within policy. Hook is properly formatted, interesting and within policy, although I'm not sure if "that were armed with" is necessary. Why not just "...to be launched with guns larger than..."? QPQ has been competed and image is within policy. Looks good to go.
Dana boomer (
talk) 18:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
I like your phrasing better.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk) 18:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)