The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 21:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
– Article: new, long enough, well referenced, no sign of plagiarism, etc. Hook: very interesting, properly formatted, cited with an inline citation in the article. Good to go.
— Bill william comptonTalk 16:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 21:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
– Article: new, long enough, well referenced, no sign of plagiarism, etc. Hook: very interesting, properly formatted, cited with an inline citation in the article. Good to go.
— Bill william comptonTalk 16:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)