The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 10:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
... that in Microsoft v. AT&T, copying and installing software abroad onto foreign-manufactured computers were not considered as patent infringement under U.S. Patent Law?
5x expansion has not been done in enough time.
Thine Antique Pen (
talk) 12:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Thine Antique Pen is correct on the technicality. Both editor and nominator are newbies to Wikipedia. The article is about a case decided by the
United States Supreme Court. As an FYI, in case anyone can find cause to give this a second look:
Wulingqi is a new editor as of September 2012
Article created by Jmcneill2 on May 1, 2007 as a one-sentence stub
July 31, 2012, article had 831 characters of readable prose
13.65X expansion by Wulingqi on October 17, 2012, first day of expanding, brought the article to 11,349 characters of readable prose
Wulingqi has continued to improve the article since that date
Article currently has 12,019 characters of readable prose
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 10:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
... that in Microsoft v. AT&T, copying and installing software abroad onto foreign-manufactured computers were not considered as patent infringement under U.S. Patent Law?
5x expansion has not been done in enough time.
Thine Antique Pen (
talk) 12:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Thine Antique Pen is correct on the technicality. Both editor and nominator are newbies to Wikipedia. The article is about a case decided by the
United States Supreme Court. As an FYI, in case anyone can find cause to give this a second look:
Wulingqi is a new editor as of September 2012
Article created by Jmcneill2 on May 1, 2007 as a one-sentence stub
July 31, 2012, article had 831 characters of readable prose
13.65X expansion by Wulingqi on October 17, 2012, first day of expanding, brought the article to 11,349 characters of readable prose
Wulingqi has continued to improve the article since that date
Article currently has 12,019 characters of readable prose