The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 15:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Improved to Good Article status by LunaEatsTuna ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 03:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Micronations and the Search for Sovereignty; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Article meets all eligibility criteria. Surprised that no one has picked this up for review close to a month after the nomination. Re: the sourcing for the hook, the journal link draws on a feature review by a reviewer (academic) in the journal. Specifically, it draws on these two lines I presume -- Despite the increasing number of articles regarding micronations being published, thereis a dearth of books regarding this topic. Therefore, Hobbs & Williams’ Micronations-and-the-Search-for-Sovereignty (202)shouldbewelcomed as a building block for research into micronations as it provides an in depth examination of this phenomenon.
. Two questions to the nominator: Does this review of the book by an academic reviewer suffice to say that this is one of the earliest books on the topic? Also, I am good with this hook, but, can we do something here to increase its appeal to a relatively lay audience? I will defer to the nominator on the second question on interestingness. Nice work.
Ktin (
talk) 04:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 15:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Improved to Good Article status by LunaEatsTuna ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 03:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Micronations and the Search for Sovereignty; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Article meets all eligibility criteria. Surprised that no one has picked this up for review close to a month after the nomination. Re: the sourcing for the hook, the journal link draws on a feature review by a reviewer (academic) in the journal. Specifically, it draws on these two lines I presume -- Despite the increasing number of articles regarding micronations being published, thereis a dearth of books regarding this topic. Therefore, Hobbs & Williams’ Micronations-and-the-Search-for-Sovereignty (202)shouldbewelcomed as a building block for research into micronations as it provides an in depth examination of this phenomenon.
. Two questions to the nominator: Does this review of the book by an academic reviewer suffice to say that this is one of the earliest books on the topic? Also, I am good with this hook, but, can we do something here to increase its appeal to a relatively lay audience? I will defer to the nominator on the second question on interestingness. Nice work.
Ktin (
talk) 04:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)