The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 17:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
... that art historians often find it difficult to judge whether 17th-century merry company paintings (example illustrated) show scenes of
prostitution or not?
Created by
Johnbod (
talk). Self nominated at 04:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC).
Hook relates to current refs 6-14; 6, 12 or 14 each ought to be enough on their own.
Johnbod (
talk) 10:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Length, date verified. Hook's offline ref accepted AGF by seasoned editor. All non-lede paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RL. No copyvio detected. Interesting hook; its length is fine. QPQ done. Image from commons. Comprehensive, well refed article; it is GTG. --
Rosiestep (
talk) 16:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 17:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
... that art historians often find it difficult to judge whether 17th-century merry company paintings (example illustrated) show scenes of
prostitution or not?
Created by
Johnbod (
talk). Self nominated at 04:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC).
Hook relates to current refs 6-14; 6, 12 or 14 each ought to be enough on their own.
Johnbod (
talk) 10:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Length, date verified. Hook's offline ref accepted AGF by seasoned editor. All non-lede paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RL. No copyvio detected. Interesting hook; its length is fine. QPQ done. Image from commons. Comprehensive, well refed article; it is GTG. --
Rosiestep (
talk) 16:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)