The result was: rejected by
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk) 03:55, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Currently ineligible for DYK, but may be renominated if promoted to GA.
DYK toolbox |
---|
Created by MaxnaCarta ( talk). Self-nominated at 06:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
@
MaxnaCarta: Thank you for what I presume is your first DYK submission. You've done admirable expansion, but I haven't seen evidence that it meets the 5x expansion threshold needed for DYK. Also, less seriously but still blocking approval, are a couple of paragraphs lacking citations altogether. –
John M Wolfson (
talk •
contribs) 23:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
@ MaxnaCarta: Yes, GA-to-DYK is certainly a viable pipeline, one which I've used many a time myself. As for the 5x increase, the readable prose size (i.e., excluding charts, tables, infoboxes, etc.) was at 7.6 kB before you improved it, meaning it would have to be increased to 38kB in the next couple of days. However, it's only at 17k bytes, so I don't think it's feasible at this point unless you want to go on a mad rave. Best of luck in your GAC! – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 02:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was: rejected by
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk) 03:55, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Currently ineligible for DYK, but may be renominated if promoted to GA.
DYK toolbox |
---|
Created by MaxnaCarta ( talk). Self-nominated at 06:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
@
MaxnaCarta: Thank you for what I presume is your first DYK submission. You've done admirable expansion, but I haven't seen evidence that it meets the 5x expansion threshold needed for DYK. Also, less seriously but still blocking approval, are a couple of paragraphs lacking citations altogether. –
John M Wolfson (
talk •
contribs) 23:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
@ MaxnaCarta: Yes, GA-to-DYK is certainly a viable pipeline, one which I've used many a time myself. As for the 5x increase, the readable prose size (i.e., excluding charts, tables, infoboxes, etc.) was at 7.6 kB before you improved it, meaning it would have to be increased to 38kB in the next couple of days. However, it's only at 17k bytes, so I don't think it's feasible at this point unless you want to go on a mad rave. Best of luck in your GAC! – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 02:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)