The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Illegitimate Barrister: Hey, welcome to DYK. DYK articles need 1,500 prose characters and this one currently has 374. You will need to expand the article considerably to that 1,500 prose character length. The
DYKcheck plugin may help you as you expand this page to the length necessary.
Raymie (
t •
c) 19:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Nominator will not be expanding the article any further, and at 658 prose characters as of today, it is far too short to qualify for DYK. Marking for closure as unsuccessful.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 15:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Illegitimate Barrister: Hey, welcome to DYK. DYK articles need 1,500 prose characters and this one currently has 374. You will need to expand the article considerably to that 1,500 prose character length. The
DYKcheck plugin may help you as you expand this page to the length necessary.
Raymie (
t •
c) 19:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Nominator will not be expanding the article any further, and at 658 prose characters as of today, it is far too short to qualify for DYK. Marking for closure as unsuccessful.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 15:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC)