The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
... that the Marriage (Wales) Act 2010 was passed by Parliament to bring the marriage law of the disestablished Church in Wales (coat of arms pictured) into line with the established Church of England? Source:
University of Reading
5x expanded by
The C of E (
talk). Self-nominated at 11:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC).
New enough by 5k expansion, easily long enough, hook sources, no clear POv violations, no plagiarism issues, and interesting enough.
YEPacificHurricane 07:17, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
@
Yellow Evan: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the
five main DYK criteria have been met. You have covered newness, length, and inline cite (I think). Missing are neutrality and close paraphrasing checks. Thank you,
Yoninah (
talk) 23:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
@
Yoninah: Cleared up, thanks for bringing this to my attention.
YEPacificHurricane 23:59, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
@
Yellow Evan: Could you add another green tick for it in a new comment beneath this one please? It's simply because the again symbol used by Yoninah overrides the original tick in the bot's eyes. The C of E God Save the Queen! (
talk) 07:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Restoring tick.
Yoninah (
talk) 09:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
... that the Marriage (Wales) Act 2010 was passed by Parliament to bring the marriage law of the disestablished Church in Wales (coat of arms pictured) into line with the established Church of England? Source:
University of Reading
5x expanded by
The C of E (
talk). Self-nominated at 11:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC).
New enough by 5k expansion, easily long enough, hook sources, no clear POv violations, no plagiarism issues, and interesting enough.
YEPacificHurricane 07:17, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
@
Yellow Evan: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the
five main DYK criteria have been met. You have covered newness, length, and inline cite (I think). Missing are neutrality and close paraphrasing checks. Thank you,
Yoninah (
talk) 23:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
@
Yoninah: Cleared up, thanks for bringing this to my attention.
YEPacificHurricane 23:59, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
@
Yellow Evan: Could you add another green tick for it in a new comment beneath this one please? It's simply because the again symbol used by Yoninah overrides the original tick in the bot's eyes. The C of E God Save the Queen! (
talk) 07:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Restoring tick.
Yoninah (
talk) 09:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)