The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 08:19, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
5x expanded (I think, a double-check would be appreciated).
Andrew Gray (
talk) 16:33, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
DYKcheck agrees.
Secretlondon (
talk) 21:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Review added.
Andrew Gray (
talk) 11:59, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
QPQ is done. Hook is properly formatted. Image has a fair use rational. Article was expanded enough. Hooked fact found in article and supported by sources. Plagiarism check
here and
here show no major cause for concern.
Paywall source was not plagiarised and supports text.
Article is not fully supported by sources. (Plagiarism check cannot be done as the amount of text uncited is substantial.) Raw URLs are found in the reference section.
Fix raw URLs in references. Fully support article with references so facts can be verified. --
LauraHale (
talk) 21:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Looks to have been fixed now.
Andrew Gray (
talk) 23:10, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Good to go. --
LauraHale (
talk) 20:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 08:19, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
5x expanded (I think, a double-check would be appreciated).
Andrew Gray (
talk) 16:33, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
DYKcheck agrees.
Secretlondon (
talk) 21:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Review added.
Andrew Gray (
talk) 11:59, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
QPQ is done. Hook is properly formatted. Image has a fair use rational. Article was expanded enough. Hooked fact found in article and supported by sources. Plagiarism check
here and
here show no major cause for concern.
Paywall source was not plagiarised and supports text.
Article is not fully supported by sources. (Plagiarism check cannot be done as the amount of text uncited is substantial.) Raw URLs are found in the reference section.
Fix raw URLs in references. Fully support article with references so facts can be verified. --
LauraHale (
talk) 21:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Looks to have been fixed now.
Andrew Gray (
talk) 23:10, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Good to go. --
LauraHale (
talk) 20:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)