The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 18:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
ALT1:... that MLS Cup 2007 was the third consecutive championship that was lost by the
New England Revolution? Source: The Boston Globe (November 19, 2007)
5x expanded by
SounderBruce (
talk). Self-nominated at 04:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC).
5x expansion done, and the article was nominated in the required timeframe. No close paraphrasing was found, the article is stable, adequately sourced, and neutral. Images in the article are either allowed under fair use or are properly licensed. Facts for both hooks are cited inline and verified. Both hooks are approved, although I have a slight preference for the first hook (will not object if the second hook is promoted instead, however). This will be good to go once the QPQ is done.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 11:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 18:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
ALT1:... that MLS Cup 2007 was the third consecutive championship that was lost by the
New England Revolution? Source: The Boston Globe (November 19, 2007)
5x expanded by
SounderBruce (
talk). Self-nominated at 04:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC).
5x expansion done, and the article was nominated in the required timeframe. No close paraphrasing was found, the article is stable, adequately sourced, and neutral. Images in the article are either allowed under fair use or are properly licensed. Facts for both hooks are cited inline and verified. Both hooks are approved, although I have a slight preference for the first hook (will not object if the second hook is promoted instead, however). This will be good to go once the QPQ is done.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 11:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)