The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 20:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Toa Nidhiki05 (
talk). Self nom at 03:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
article is new enough, long and cited enough and neutral enough. There is a big quote but not rampant plagiarism. Hook is in article, referenced and supported, even though reference is not independent. QPQ easy to find and no image so Good to Go.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 10:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 20:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Toa Nidhiki05 (
talk). Self nom at 03:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
article is new enough, long and cited enough and neutral enough. There is a big quote but not rampant plagiarism. Hook is in article, referenced and supported, even though reference is not independent. QPQ easy to find and no image so Good to Go.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 10:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)