The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
SL93 (
talk) 19:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Luciferwildcat (
talk). Self nom at 01:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Article was expanded by nominator over the period Jan. 5 - Jan. 11, but expansion was not even twofold. --
MelanieN (
talk) 00:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
It was still a substantial expansion, maybe I can expand it some more?
LuciferWildCat (
talk) 02:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Since the editor and I have a history, and since they dispute my rating, I request that someone else take over evaluating this nomination. This editor is new to DYK so you may wish to explain your rationale for any evaluation. --
MelanieN (
talk) 03:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want this to be in DYK, you will need 13,000 characters or more. The
old revision is 2633, and to qualify for DYK the article must be at least 5x expansion.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 06:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
SL93 (
talk) 19:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Luciferwildcat (
talk). Self nom at 01:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Article was expanded by nominator over the period Jan. 5 - Jan. 11, but expansion was not even twofold. --
MelanieN (
talk) 00:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
It was still a substantial expansion, maybe I can expand it some more?
LuciferWildCat (
talk) 02:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Since the editor and I have a history, and since they dispute my rating, I request that someone else take over evaluating this nomination. This editor is new to DYK so you may wish to explain your rationale for any evaluation. --
MelanieN (
talk) 03:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want this to be in DYK, you will need 13,000 characters or more. The
old revision is 2633, and to qualify for DYK the article must be at least 5x expansion.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 06:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)