The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Article is long enough, qualifies as having passed Good Article status (on May 7). The GA review on the talk page shows that it is within policy. Hook is interesting and cited properly. Looks ready to go to me. I don't think its a big problem that the photo isn't contemporary to the film, readers will figure that out. I bolded the article name in the hook per the convention for DYK (it was italicized as a title). --
Krelnik (
talk) 11:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Article is long enough, qualifies as having passed Good Article status (on May 7). The GA review on the talk page shows that it is within policy. Hook is interesting and cited properly. Looks ready to go to me. I don't think its a big problem that the photo isn't contemporary to the film, readers will figure that out. I bolded the article name in the hook per the convention for DYK (it was italicized as a title). --
Krelnik (
talk) 11:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)