The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Carabinieri (
talk) 19:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Lihaas (
talk). Self nom at 06:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Article is good to go. Article is new enough, long enough, well-referenced, hook is referenced. --
SupernovaExplosionTalk 07:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm concerned that some of the phrasing and structure used by this article may be too close to that of
this source.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 12:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
better? also please post on my page as after a week of sanction i thought itd be okey
Lihaas (
talk) 14:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Better, although still a bit close - "The party is considered the most organised political force in the country" vs "the Brotherhood is considered the most organised movement in Libya", "Islamic law as the source of legislation" vs "Islamic law would be the main source of legislation".
Nikkimaria (
talk) 14:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Any suggestions? Tried
thisLihaas (
talk) 07:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Carabinieri (
talk) 19:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Lihaas (
talk). Self nom at 06:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Article is good to go. Article is new enough, long enough, well-referenced, hook is referenced. --
SupernovaExplosionTalk 07:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm concerned that some of the phrasing and structure used by this article may be too close to that of
this source.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 12:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
better? also please post on my page as after a week of sanction i thought itd be okey
Lihaas (
talk) 14:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Better, although still a bit close - "The party is considered the most organised political force in the country" vs "the Brotherhood is considered the most organised movement in Libya", "Islamic law as the source of legislation" vs "Islamic law would be the main source of legislation".
Nikkimaria (
talk) 14:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Any suggestions? Tried
thisLihaas (
talk) 07:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC)