The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 03:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Violetriga (
talk). Self nom at 23:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
A curious and interesting hook, and a fine article. Sources look good, AGF on the offline one, spotchecks reveal no obvious signs of plagiarism or copyvios, and the article is well-written and well-sourced. Good to go.
Prioryman (
talk) 17:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSkytalk 03:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Violetriga (
talk). Self nom at 23:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
A curious and interesting hook, and a fine article. Sources look good, AGF on the offline one, spotchecks reveal no obvious signs of plagiarism or copyvios, and the article is well-written and well-sourced. Good to go.
Prioryman (
talk) 17:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)