The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxtontalk 20:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Yakikaki please note that as the emergency backlog mode has been activated and you have more than 20 nominations, you will need to provide two QPQs.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 01:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Aha, I wasn't aware. OK, I will fix it.
Yakikaki (
talk) 09:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Update: I have now done a second DYK review and included it above.
Yakikaki (
talk) 10:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
New enough (nominated same day it was moved into mainspace); long enough (2495 characters); well presented enough. Sourcing is adequate (two books from 1926 and 1932); would be better with at least one newer source but not a deal breaker. AGF on Swedish book as source. No apparent copyvio based on comparison with Benson. Image has been on Commons since 2021 with a CC0 license and looks to be OK to use. Two QPQs were completed per emergency backlog requirement. Hook checks out factually and is interesting.
Cielquiparle (
talk) 18:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxtontalk 20:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Yakikaki please note that as the emergency backlog mode has been activated and you have more than 20 nominations, you will need to provide two QPQs.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 01:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Aha, I wasn't aware. OK, I will fix it.
Yakikaki (
talk) 09:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Update: I have now done a second DYK review and included it above.
Yakikaki (
talk) 10:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
New enough (nominated same day it was moved into mainspace); long enough (2495 characters); well presented enough. Sourcing is adequate (two books from 1926 and 1932); would be better with at least one newer source but not a deal breaker. AGF on Swedish book as source. No apparent copyvio based on comparison with Benson. Image has been on Commons since 2021 with a CC0 license and looks to be OK to use. Two QPQs were completed per emergency backlog requirement. Hook checks out factually and is interesting.
Cielquiparle (
talk) 18:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)