The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 08:34, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Created and nominated by
Muboshgu (
talk) at 16:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC).
Long enough (2365b), created recently enough (11/18). Hook is cited; article is well cited in general. Well done; looks good to me. — AJDStalk 21:32, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
@
Alekjds: did you check the sources for
close paraphrasing? Also, the nomination cannot be approved until a
QPQ is submitted by the page nominator.
Yoninah (
talk) 21:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Apologies for the sloppy check. There is no close paraphrasing that I saw; the prose is pretty basic and the sources are well integrated. And yes, we're waiting for the QPQ review. — AJDStalk 07:16, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
I put a notification template on the nominator's talk page.
Yoninah (
talk) 09:53, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
On its way... –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
And I finally got around to completing a QPQ review. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 16:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. (Please remember to sign your QPQ review.) I re-reviewed this nomination for close paraphrasing, and found none. Hook ref verified and cited inline. Good to go.
Yoninah (
talk) 22:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Oops! Thanks for pointing that out. And for the review. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 22:37, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 08:34, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Created and nominated by
Muboshgu (
talk) at 16:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC).
Long enough (2365b), created recently enough (11/18). Hook is cited; article is well cited in general. Well done; looks good to me. — AJDStalk 21:32, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
@
Alekjds: did you check the sources for
close paraphrasing? Also, the nomination cannot be approved until a
QPQ is submitted by the page nominator.
Yoninah (
talk) 21:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Apologies for the sloppy check. There is no close paraphrasing that I saw; the prose is pretty basic and the sources are well integrated. And yes, we're waiting for the QPQ review. — AJDStalk 07:16, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
I put a notification template on the nominator's talk page.
Yoninah (
talk) 09:53, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
On its way... –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
And I finally got around to completing a QPQ review. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 16:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. (Please remember to sign your QPQ review.) I re-reviewed this nomination for close paraphrasing, and found none. Hook ref verified and cited inline. Good to go.
Yoninah (
talk) 22:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Oops! Thanks for pointing that out. And for the review. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 22:37, 26 November 2014 (UTC)