The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Launchballertalk 10:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
New article that was moved to mainspace on 7 May 2024 is 6,909 characters and nominated on the same day.
No copyvios detected (high confidence of violation due to publication titles; AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 156 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Refs 2 and 4 (verifying the hook) are reliable sources. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —
Bloom6132 (
talk) 04:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
@
Crisco 1492: Not a DYK issue, but there are a lot of CS1 errors in this article's references, and you probably noticed yesterday's
WT:DYK#Lie Kiat Teng comment about them so you may wish to remedy them sooner rather than later.--Launchballer 10:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Launchballertalk 10:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
New article that was moved to mainspace on 7 May 2024 is 6,909 characters and nominated on the same day.
No copyvios detected (high confidence of violation due to publication titles; AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 156 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Refs 2 and 4 (verifying the hook) are reliable sources. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —
Bloom6132 (
talk) 04:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
@
Crisco 1492: Not a DYK issue, but there are a lot of CS1 errors in this article's references, and you probably noticed yesterday's
WT:DYK#Lie Kiat Teng comment about them so you may wish to remedy them sooner rather than later.--Launchballer 10:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)