The result was: promoted by
Hawkeye7 (
talk) 22:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Created by Thriley ( talk) and Silver seren ( talk). Nominated by Silver seren ( talk) at 19:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC).
The hook which is properly formatted, interesting enough, and is stated in the article, and immediately followed by an inline citation to a reliable source. To be very picky, I noticed two minor contraventions of the Manual of style: decades should not have an apostophe (e.g. 1960s, not 1960's) and the list of books should be in chronological order - neither of these affects DYK approval. The article is currently tagged as a Stub, which would normally invalidate it from DYK, but I believe that is an error and that Stub tag should be removed. Once that is done, it should be approved. Gronk Oz ( talk) 06:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Hawkeye7 (
talk) 22:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Created by Thriley ( talk) and Silver seren ( talk). Nominated by Silver seren ( talk) at 19:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC).
The hook which is properly formatted, interesting enough, and is stated in the article, and immediately followed by an inline citation to a reliable source. To be very picky, I noticed two minor contraventions of the Manual of style: decades should not have an apostophe (e.g. 1960s, not 1960's) and the list of books should be in chronological order - neither of these affects DYK approval. The article is currently tagged as a Stub, which would normally invalidate it from DYK, but I believe that is an error and that Stub tag should be removed. Once that is done, it should be approved. Gronk Oz ( talk) 06:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)