From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 ( talk) 00:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Hoyt Wilhelm

Improved to Good Article status by EricEnfermero ( talk). Nominated by Eurodyne ( talk) at 15:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC).

  • Looks good to me. No copyvio, QPQ not needed, within policies, promoted to a good article. Source backs up hook and it's catchy enough. But since I have no real experience with "administrating DYKs" I leave the "move to prep area" up to someone else. ( tJosve05a ( c) 20:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • FYI @ Josve05a: per Rule N1, it is also best to avoid promoting the same article that you reviewed, nominated, or created. Yoninah ( talk) 18:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • @ Yoninah: Josve did not create, review or nominate the article. Eurodyne ( talk) 19:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I was merely responding to Josve05a's note, But since I have no real experience with "administrating DYKs" I leave the "move to prep area" up to someone else. Since he just reviewed the hook, he shouldn't move it to the prep area (i.e., "promote" it). Yoninah ( talk) 08:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 ( talk) 00:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Hoyt Wilhelm

Improved to Good Article status by EricEnfermero ( talk). Nominated by Eurodyne ( talk) at 15:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC).

  • Looks good to me. No copyvio, QPQ not needed, within policies, promoted to a good article. Source backs up hook and it's catchy enough. But since I have no real experience with "administrating DYKs" I leave the "move to prep area" up to someone else. ( tJosve05a ( c) 20:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • FYI @ Josve05a: per Rule N1, it is also best to avoid promoting the same article that you reviewed, nominated, or created. Yoninah ( talk) 18:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • @ Yoninah: Josve did not create, review or nominate the article. Eurodyne ( talk) 19:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I was merely responding to Josve05a's note, But since I have no real experience with "administrating DYKs" I leave the "move to prep area" up to someone else. Since he just reviewed the hook, he shouldn't move it to the prep area (i.e., "promote" it). Yoninah ( talk) 08:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook