The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSky
talk 03:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Created/expanded by IceCreamAntisocial ( talk). Nominated by Rcej ( talk) at 10:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Length, newness OK, no policy violations. Nice PD picture, hook is interesting, review checks out. Main fact is cited.
I might be overly dense here, but I'm unsure about using the specific phrase "bean flower" to describe the plant, which isn't obviously supported by the article's contents nor Fabaceae. Would it be acceptable to change the wikilinking like this: "... roots of the bean flower "? -- Pnm ( talk) 15:16, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
PumpkinSky
talk 03:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Created/expanded by IceCreamAntisocial ( talk). Nominated by Rcej ( talk) at 10:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Length, newness OK, no policy violations. Nice PD picture, hook is interesting, review checks out. Main fact is cited.
I might be overly dense here, but I'm unsure about using the specific phrase "bean flower" to describe the plant, which isn't obviously supported by the article's contents nor Fabaceae. Would it be acceptable to change the wikilinking like this: "... roots of the bean flower "? -- Pnm ( talk) 15:16, 23 November 2011 (UTC)