The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 01:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Retroplum (
talk). Self nominated at 16:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC).
This is a pretty nice article, long enough, new enough and well sourced. The hook is fine and is referenced. However, there seem to be some faults with the sourcing syntax; three (Jones, Munch and Venning) are showing up with error messages, "There is no link pointing to this citation". Could you please fix this?
Prioryman (
talk)
@
Prioryman: Hmm, I couldn't see any errors. I think it must be because I don't have this
script. In any case I changed "citation" to "cite book" so I think it should be error free now. Thanks.
Retroplum (
talk)
Yep, sorted. Thanks for doing that. We're good to go.
Prioryman (
talk) 23:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 01:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Retroplum (
talk). Self nominated at 16:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC).
This is a pretty nice article, long enough, new enough and well sourced. The hook is fine and is referenced. However, there seem to be some faults with the sourcing syntax; three (Jones, Munch and Venning) are showing up with error messages, "There is no link pointing to this citation". Could you please fix this?
Prioryman (
talk)
@
Prioryman: Hmm, I couldn't see any errors. I think it must be because I don't have this
script. In any case I changed "citation" to "cite book" so I think it should be error free now. Thanks.
Retroplum (
talk)
Yep, sorted. Thanks for doing that. We're good to go.
Prioryman (
talk) 23:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)