The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yazan (
talk) 13:27, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
New enough, long enough (only just), suitably referenced, no copyright violations detected looking at a sample of the references. Hook is referenced. QPQ is missing, though, based on the assumption that you have at least five previous DYKs. If that is not the case, please advise. Schwede66 17:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
QPQ not needed as Legoktm has 3 DYKs.
Thine Antique Pen (
talk) 17:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Good to go in that case. Schwede66 17:32, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yazan (
talk) 13:27, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
New enough, long enough (only just), suitably referenced, no copyright violations detected looking at a sample of the references. Hook is referenced. QPQ is missing, though, based on the assumption that you have at least five previous DYKs. If that is not the case, please advise. Schwede66 17:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
QPQ not needed as Legoktm has 3 DYKs.
Thine Antique Pen (
talk) 17:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Good to go in that case. Schwede66 17:32, 20 November 2012 (UTC)