The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 02:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk). Self-nominated at 19:34, 18 August 2021 (UTC).
Starting review--
Kevmin§ 20:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Article new enough and long enough, each paragraph sourced and neutral. hook cited sourced and verified. One question, the last sentence in the ecology section seems to have the wrong genus for the
Diplomonad parasite, with the current wording using Haemopis by mistake.--
Kevmin§ 16:56, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
@
Kevmin: Well spotted! I have corrected it.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 20:00, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Article now fully neutral and reflecting cited sources, with paywalled citation 3 taken AGF based on abstract posted. no policy issues have been identified and Nom is good to go.--
Kevmin§ 00:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 02:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk). Self-nominated at 19:34, 18 August 2021 (UTC).
Starting review--
Kevmin§ 20:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Article new enough and long enough, each paragraph sourced and neutral. hook cited sourced and verified. One question, the last sentence in the ecology section seems to have the wrong genus for the
Diplomonad parasite, with the current wording using Haemopis by mistake.--
Kevmin§ 16:56, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
@
Kevmin: Well spotted! I have corrected it.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 20:00, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Article now fully neutral and reflecting cited sources, with paywalled citation 3 taken AGF based on abstract posted. no policy issues have been identified and Nom is good to go.--
Kevmin§ 00:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC)