The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron ( talk) 00:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Haematomma ochroleucum

Haematomma ochroleucum var. porphyrium

• ... that the lichen Haematomma ochroleucum comes in two colour forms, depending on whether or not it produces usnic acid? Source: Fryday, Alan & Coppins, Brian (July 1997). "Keys to Sterile, Crustose Saxicolous and Terricolous Lichens Occuring in the British Isles". Lichenologist. 29 (4): 301–332. doi: 10.1006/lich.1997.0080. S2CID  85647115.
  • ALT1: ... that the yellow bloodstain lichen might not be yellow? Source: Fryday, Alan & Coppins, Brian (July 1997). "Keys to Sterile, Crustose Saxicolous and Terricolous Lichens Occuring in the British Isles". Lichenologist. 29 (4): 301–332. doi: 10.1006/lich.1997.0080. S2CID  85647115.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Silvia Bottini
  • Comment: Yes, it's another old review. I still have a stack of them!

Moved to mainspace by MeegsC ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC).

• Starting Review-- Kev min § 14:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

• Article long enough, and move to main space in the right timeframe. Article is cited to reliable sources, and neutral in prose. The hooks are cited and verified with the sources. No policy issues or copyvios identified. Looks good to go.-- Kev min § 14:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)