The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Keilana|Parlez ici 05:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment: A triple nomination, but all three articles are pretty short so it shouldn't be too hard to review...
Created by
Prioryman (
talk). Self-nominated at 11:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC).
These three articles are neutral and I found no close paraphrasing or other copyright issues. Two of them are new articles and long enough. The third is an expansion but I do not think the article is sufficiently expanded to qualify for DYK. Previously it had 1667B and now it has 5800B. It needs to be 8335B, if my maths is correct.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure how you're working that out. Assuming you're counting
Grain Fort as the third article, the expansion is from
this version (256B) to
[1] (5800B). The article title was previously used in error for an article on
Grain Tower, which seems to often be confused with Grain Fort.
Prioryman (
talk) 11:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
I was misled by your edit summary "Reduce to stub in preparation for new article". I see now that the article is a five-fold expansion. However I do not find inline citations supporting the hook.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 17:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Good point, I've added a couple of cited lines to each of
Grain Wing Battery and
Dummy Battery which should resolve this. The existing source for the paragraphs in question (i.e. Kent's Defence Heritage – Gazetteer Part One) covers the added content.
Prioryman (
talk) 21:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Good, this nomination is now ready to go forward.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 09:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Keilana|Parlez ici 05:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment: A triple nomination, but all three articles are pretty short so it shouldn't be too hard to review...
Created by
Prioryman (
talk). Self-nominated at 11:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC).
These three articles are neutral and I found no close paraphrasing or other copyright issues. Two of them are new articles and long enough. The third is an expansion but I do not think the article is sufficiently expanded to qualify for DYK. Previously it had 1667B and now it has 5800B. It needs to be 8335B, if my maths is correct.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure how you're working that out. Assuming you're counting
Grain Fort as the third article, the expansion is from
this version (256B) to
[1] (5800B). The article title was previously used in error for an article on
Grain Tower, which seems to often be confused with Grain Fort.
Prioryman (
talk) 11:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
I was misled by your edit summary "Reduce to stub in preparation for new article". I see now that the article is a five-fold expansion. However I do not find inline citations supporting the hook.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 17:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Good point, I've added a couple of cited lines to each of
Grain Wing Battery and
Dummy Battery which should resolve this. The existing source for the paragraphs in question (i.e. Kent's Defence Heritage – Gazetteer Part One) covers the added content.
Prioryman (
talk) 21:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Good, this nomination is now ready to go forward.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 09:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)