The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Evrik (
talk) 04:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Jordano53 (
talk). Self-nominated at 03:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough, well written and sourced, and appears to be policy compliant. Also, Earwig has detected no issues. Hook is short enough, appropriately cited/sourced, and interesting. Photo has PD license, so that appears fine, too. At this time, the nominator has only four prior DYKs, so no QPQ is required. Add that all up, and it's good to go.
Cbl62 (
talk) 02:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Evrik (
talk) 04:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Jordano53 (
talk). Self-nominated at 03:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough, well written and sourced, and appears to be policy compliant. Also, Earwig has detected no issues. Hook is short enough, appropriately cited/sourced, and interesting. Photo has PD license, so that appears fine, too. At this time, the nominator has only four prior DYKs, so no QPQ is required. Add that all up, and it's good to go.
Cbl62 (
talk) 02:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)