The result was: promoted by
Allen3
talk 14:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by Shirt58 ( talk). Self nom at 12:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Review Article length and sources check out. Uses in line citations. However, it was new on 12 March, expanded a few days later, and may be untimely. Nice article. Well documented. The current "controversy" ('landscape of a mass murder') might be an alternative hook. Plagiarism checker shows it to be clean of copyright violations. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 12:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Some people put dispute flags up at the drop of the hat. I'm glad that you recognize that the article is sound and well researched. At least, that's what I concluded. I would suppose the one section about 2005 prize could get an additional source. The five day waiver question is basically above my pay grade. But it is new material to wikipedia, and a well done, well thought out and fairly large addition at that. It is good to see an article of this import put out when it is mainly focused on Tasmania. So if the line has some wiggle room for interpretation and application, this is one where a fuzzy interpretation could give a good interpretation and some publicity to a deserving candidate. It is within the spirit of the DYK rules, even it is outside the letter of the law. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 22:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Allen3
talk 14:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by Shirt58 ( talk). Self nom at 12:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Review Article length and sources check out. Uses in line citations. However, it was new on 12 March, expanded a few days later, and may be untimely. Nice article. Well documented. The current "controversy" ('landscape of a mass murder') might be an alternative hook. Plagiarism checker shows it to be clean of copyright violations. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 12:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Some people put dispute flags up at the drop of the hat. I'm glad that you recognize that the article is sound and well researched. At least, that's what I concluded. I would suppose the one section about 2005 prize could get an additional source. The five day waiver question is basically above my pay grade. But it is new material to wikipedia, and a well done, well thought out and fairly large addition at that. It is good to see an article of this import put out when it is mainly focused on Tasmania. So if the line has some wiggle room for interpretation and application, this is one where a fuzzy interpretation could give a good interpretation and some publicity to a deserving candidate. It is within the spirit of the DYK rules, even it is outside the letter of the law. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 22:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)