The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 11:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
... that the
Shuberts built New York City's Broadhurst and Plymouth theaters on land left over from another pair of theaters? Source: Morrison, William (1999). Broadway Theatres: History and Architecture. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. p. 103.
ALT1: ... that while New York City law required an alley to be built for the Broadhurst and Plymouth theaters, it was closed right after the theaters' completion? Source: Bloom, Ken (2007). The Routledge Guide to Broadway (1st ed.). Routledge. p. 86.
ALT2: ... that
Herbert J. Krapp designed the Broadhurst and Plymouth theaters with very similar brick-and-terracotta facades but widely differing interiors? Source: Morrison 1999, pp. 103, 105.
ALT3: ... that the
Shuberts built New York City's Broadhurst and Plymouth theaters on land left over from the Shubert and Booth theaters? Source: Morrison, William (1999). Broadway Theatres: History and Architecture. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. p. 103. See also
Template:Did you know nominations/Shubert Theatre (Broadway); if this hook is chosen, it has to be approved in both nominations.
Comment: ALT3 and ALT4 are combinations with another double hook,
Template:Did you know nominations/Shubert Theatre (Broadway). For both articles, I only counted the prose size and not references or lists in the expansion, per DYK rules. If the combined hooks are not satisfactory, I can provide individual hooks for both pages.
5x expanded by
Epicgenius (
talk). Self-nominated at 14:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC).
Epicgenius, have you completed any QPQs for this nomination yet? Ideally, the QPQ should be done within a week of nomination. Please see
RfC on excessively late supply of QPQ credits. I will be happy to review all four of these. Thanks.
Flibirigit (
talk) 23:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
I do actually have five QPQs in progress (three for this nom and two for upcoming noms). These should be done within the next day. I actually !voted in that RFC - I wasn't really a fan of the one-week rule, but I can provide QPQs when they are requested. Thanks for the heads up.
Epicgenius (
talk) 01:44, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Great, will complete the reviews by the end of the weekend.
Flibirigit (
talk) 17:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Done. Article's prose was expanded more than fivefold on January 23 and nominated within seven days. Length and sourcing are adequate. Article is neutral in tone and no plagiarism concerns were found. All images used in the article are freely licensed on the Commons. QPQ requirement is complete. I will analyze the hooks once I have reviewed all four of the articles for DYK policy.
Flibirigit (
talk) 12:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
This is not a DYK requirement, but it might be useful to include
Template:Currency at the first mention of money to be clear the amount is in US dollars.
Flibirigit (
talk) 13:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Done. Article's prose was expanded more than fivefold on January 21 and nominated within seven days. Length and sourcing are adequate. Article is neutral in tone and no plagiarism concerns were found. All images used in the article are freely licensed on the Commons. QPQ requirement is complete. I will analyze the hooks once I have reviewed all four of the articles for DYK policy.
Flibirigit (
talk) 13:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Review of hooks
I will take a break and do the hooks after lunch today.
Flibirigit (
talk) 13:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Done. All five of the hooks are interestng, properly mentioned and cited in each article. I will assume good faith for the sources which I do not have access too. There are no concerns found on this nomination. Overall approval is pending the minor concerns listed at
Template:Did you know nominations/Shubert Theatre (Broadway). Thanks for the job well done on these articles.
Flibirigit (
talk) 16:22, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Articles now adhere to all DYK criteria. All five hooks are approved as per my review above.
Flibirigit (
talk) 00:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 11:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
... that the
Shuberts built New York City's Broadhurst and Plymouth theaters on land left over from another pair of theaters? Source: Morrison, William (1999). Broadway Theatres: History and Architecture. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. p. 103.
ALT1: ... that while New York City law required an alley to be built for the Broadhurst and Plymouth theaters, it was closed right after the theaters' completion? Source: Bloom, Ken (2007). The Routledge Guide to Broadway (1st ed.). Routledge. p. 86.
ALT2: ... that
Herbert J. Krapp designed the Broadhurst and Plymouth theaters with very similar brick-and-terracotta facades but widely differing interiors? Source: Morrison 1999, pp. 103, 105.
ALT3: ... that the
Shuberts built New York City's Broadhurst and Plymouth theaters on land left over from the Shubert and Booth theaters? Source: Morrison, William (1999). Broadway Theatres: History and Architecture. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. p. 103. See also
Template:Did you know nominations/Shubert Theatre (Broadway); if this hook is chosen, it has to be approved in both nominations.
Comment: ALT3 and ALT4 are combinations with another double hook,
Template:Did you know nominations/Shubert Theatre (Broadway). For both articles, I only counted the prose size and not references or lists in the expansion, per DYK rules. If the combined hooks are not satisfactory, I can provide individual hooks for both pages.
5x expanded by
Epicgenius (
talk). Self-nominated at 14:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC).
Epicgenius, have you completed any QPQs for this nomination yet? Ideally, the QPQ should be done within a week of nomination. Please see
RfC on excessively late supply of QPQ credits. I will be happy to review all four of these. Thanks.
Flibirigit (
talk) 23:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
I do actually have five QPQs in progress (three for this nom and two for upcoming noms). These should be done within the next day. I actually !voted in that RFC - I wasn't really a fan of the one-week rule, but I can provide QPQs when they are requested. Thanks for the heads up.
Epicgenius (
talk) 01:44, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Great, will complete the reviews by the end of the weekend.
Flibirigit (
talk) 17:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Done. Article's prose was expanded more than fivefold on January 23 and nominated within seven days. Length and sourcing are adequate. Article is neutral in tone and no plagiarism concerns were found. All images used in the article are freely licensed on the Commons. QPQ requirement is complete. I will analyze the hooks once I have reviewed all four of the articles for DYK policy.
Flibirigit (
talk) 12:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
This is not a DYK requirement, but it might be useful to include
Template:Currency at the first mention of money to be clear the amount is in US dollars.
Flibirigit (
talk) 13:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Done. Article's prose was expanded more than fivefold on January 21 and nominated within seven days. Length and sourcing are adequate. Article is neutral in tone and no plagiarism concerns were found. All images used in the article are freely licensed on the Commons. QPQ requirement is complete. I will analyze the hooks once I have reviewed all four of the articles for DYK policy.
Flibirigit (
talk) 13:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Review of hooks
I will take a break and do the hooks after lunch today.
Flibirigit (
talk) 13:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Done. All five of the hooks are interestng, properly mentioned and cited in each article. I will assume good faith for the sources which I do not have access too. There are no concerns found on this nomination. Overall approval is pending the minor concerns listed at
Template:Did you know nominations/Shubert Theatre (Broadway). Thanks for the job well done on these articles.
Flibirigit (
talk) 16:22, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Articles now adhere to all DYK criteria. All five hooks are approved as per my review above.
Flibirigit (
talk) 00:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)