The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk) 19:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
5x expanded by
The Herald (
talk). Self nominated at 15:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC).
The hook is cited to "Swanson, p. 59.", but there is no indication of what this source actually is. Also, what makes Findagrave.com and Mifamilyhistory.org reliable sources? The Goodwin and Taylor references also need expanding. No other review criteria examined.
Harriastalk 22:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I have made the changes on the hook's citations. But can you please convince me why Findagrave.com and Mifamilyhistory.org are not reliable sources. -
The Herald (
here I am) 10:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
The referencing still needs some work: the citation supporting the hook does not include an accessdate, page number or publisher information, while many of the websites don't include titles. The article is plenty long enough, and underwent an appropriate expansion on the date stated. With the required work on the references, this should be okay to go.
Harriastalk 17:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
@
The Herald: It's looking a lot better, and I've done a bit on it too, but reference 6 still needs detail; at the moment there is no indicated as to what "Taylor" is.
Harriastalk 09:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
I don't think that the removal of that cite can pose any major problem to the article. Is it? -
The Herald (
here I am) 12:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Yup, got rid of that reference as superfluous. The references are all fine, appropriately supporting the hook. No evidence of copyvio or close para-phrasing found: a couple of terms are quite similar, but that's just because they are the obvious way to describe the facts, to rephrase it would get a bit silly. Good to go.
Harriastalk 16:22, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
I had to remove a citation about another man also named George F. Robinson who was from Michigan and was born in 1845. It was incorrect. I had to rewrite that sentence and used the citation from the Arlington National Cemetery instead. Another editor should look at the article. Finally I have a modest request; please do not included myself in the DYK nomination of this article. I feel uncomfortable with DYK and do not want to be recognized. Thank you-
RFD (
talk) 16:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk) 19:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
5x expanded by
The Herald (
talk). Self nominated at 15:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC).
The hook is cited to "Swanson, p. 59.", but there is no indication of what this source actually is. Also, what makes Findagrave.com and Mifamilyhistory.org reliable sources? The Goodwin and Taylor references also need expanding. No other review criteria examined.
Harriastalk 22:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I have made the changes on the hook's citations. But can you please convince me why Findagrave.com and Mifamilyhistory.org are not reliable sources. -
The Herald (
here I am) 10:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
The referencing still needs some work: the citation supporting the hook does not include an accessdate, page number or publisher information, while many of the websites don't include titles. The article is plenty long enough, and underwent an appropriate expansion on the date stated. With the required work on the references, this should be okay to go.
Harriastalk 17:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
@
The Herald: It's looking a lot better, and I've done a bit on it too, but reference 6 still needs detail; at the moment there is no indicated as to what "Taylor" is.
Harriastalk 09:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
I don't think that the removal of that cite can pose any major problem to the article. Is it? -
The Herald (
here I am) 12:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Yup, got rid of that reference as superfluous. The references are all fine, appropriately supporting the hook. No evidence of copyvio or close para-phrasing found: a couple of terms are quite similar, but that's just because they are the obvious way to describe the facts, to rephrase it would get a bit silly. Good to go.
Harriastalk 16:22, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
I had to remove a citation about another man also named George F. Robinson who was from Michigan and was born in 1845. It was incorrect. I had to rewrite that sentence and used the citation from the Arlington National Cemetery instead. Another editor should look at the article. Finally I have a modest request; please do not included myself in the DYK nomination of this article. I feel uncomfortable with DYK and do not want to be recognized. Thank you-
RFD (
talk) 16:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)