The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Montanabw(talk) 21:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
... that Geistliche Chormusik, a collection of 29 motets by Heinrich Schütz (pictured) appeared in 1648, when the Thirty Years War ended, containing a "plea for peace"?
Thanks for looking. The text quoted exactly from the source is in quotation marks. I will expand a bit tomorrow, and in that process will have a ref for the number, if obvious math doesn't comply with the rules ;) --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 17:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
You're right. I apologize for my blindness. For the inline citing of the hook fact, you can simply put ref #1 at the end of the second sentence in the lede. --
CeeGee 18:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
done, all facts and refs now in the body, - the article will never be "finished" but is presentable now ;) --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 12:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Fine. Good to go now. --
CeeGee 18:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Montanabw(talk) 21:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
... that Geistliche Chormusik, a collection of 29 motets by Heinrich Schütz (pictured) appeared in 1648, when the Thirty Years War ended, containing a "plea for peace"?
Thanks for looking. The text quoted exactly from the source is in quotation marks. I will expand a bit tomorrow, and in that process will have a ref for the number, if obvious math doesn't comply with the rules ;) --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 17:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
You're right. I apologize for my blindness. For the inline citing of the hook fact, you can simply put ref #1 at the end of the second sentence in the lede. --
CeeGee 18:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
done, all facts and refs now in the body, - the article will never be "finished" but is presentable now ;) --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 12:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Fine. Good to go now. --
CeeGee 18:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)