The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
sst✈(conjugate) 07:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
ALT1 promoted
The article was created at 14:56, 22 January 2016 and the nomination page at 23:49, 29 January 2016 which makes the gap approximately seven days and eight hours. I am not sure if the process is flexible enough for such margin but technically, it fails the criteria. Yash! 20:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
There is some flexibility over at
WP:DYKSG. See "D9: 'Seven days old' limit should be strictly enforced only if there is a large backlog of hooks. Otherwise nominated article may still be approved if it were created or expanded after the oldest date listed in
Template talk:Did you know#Older nominations." Thanks.
Viriditas (
talk) 20:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
In that case, all else checks out: new, interesting, neutral, sourced, and verifiable. QPQ is done and it's good to go! Yash! 20:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
sst✈(conjugate) 07:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
ALT1 promoted
The article was created at 14:56, 22 January 2016 and the nomination page at 23:49, 29 January 2016 which makes the gap approximately seven days and eight hours. I am not sure if the process is flexible enough for such margin but technically, it fails the criteria. Yash! 20:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
There is some flexibility over at
WP:DYKSG. See "D9: 'Seven days old' limit should be strictly enforced only if there is a large backlog of hooks. Otherwise nominated article may still be approved if it were created or expanded after the oldest date listed in
Template talk:Did you know#Older nominations." Thanks.
Viriditas (
talk) 20:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
In that case, all else checks out: new, interesting, neutral, sourced, and verifiable. QPQ is done and it's good to go! Yash! 20:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)