The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 21:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
The article length, hook and sources check out, but I was hoping to have the article tidied up a little bit before we send it to our Main Page. The key references for the hook, refs six and nine, do not have any titles; in fact, ref nine is titled "W:\document\Web\succession.wpd". Finally, while it's not a necessity, I'm sure we could throw some headings into this one!
ArcticNight 20:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Will look into it. I don't think titles are necessary, the article is not long enough IMO to not have it look messy. Will look into the refs though... –
Connormah (
talk) 20:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Since when are subheads "messy"? I formatted all the references and did a little copy-editing. Hook ref verified. Good to go.
Yoninah (
talk) 23:12, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
I sometimes find them to be messy when an article is as brief as this one, but that's just me...Thanks for the ce and verification~ –
Connormah (
talk) 17:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 21:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
The article length, hook and sources check out, but I was hoping to have the article tidied up a little bit before we send it to our Main Page. The key references for the hook, refs six and nine, do not have any titles; in fact, ref nine is titled "W:\document\Web\succession.wpd". Finally, while it's not a necessity, I'm sure we could throw some headings into this one!
ArcticNight 20:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Will look into it. I don't think titles are necessary, the article is not long enough IMO to not have it look messy. Will look into the refs though... –
Connormah (
talk) 20:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Since when are subheads "messy"? I formatted all the references and did a little copy-editing. Hook ref verified. Good to go.
Yoninah (
talk) 23:12, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
I sometimes find them to be messy when an article is as brief as this one, but that's just me...Thanks for the ce and verification~ –
Connormah (
talk) 17:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)