The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 23:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Reviewed: None yet please standby. (I do need one; I have 6 DYK credits). ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 12:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment: I know it's a day or two past the 7-day DYK eligibility but it was such a solid
WP:HEYMANN improvement by
Struway2 I really would like to see it celebrated.
Premeditated Chaos QPQ needed. 5x expanded, long enough, two days late, but that's okay. Sourced, hooks check out, no apparent copyvios. --
Usernameunique (
talk) 00:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the QPQ donations
7&6=thirteen! Nice to see these pushed through. --
Usernameunique (
talk) 03:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but I don't see anything about the validity of his contract in the article. The article just talks about his "eligibility".
Yoninah (
talk) 20:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
I was using eligibility / validity as synonymous but it's possible I misunderstood the source or am misusing a technical term. The source states that the other team disputed the eligibility of Boniface's license, which I assumed (possibly wrongly) was Google translate-ese for contract. I may be conflating two different concepts - I don't know a thing about football so I don't know if a license is the same thing as a contract. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 21:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 23:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Reviewed: None yet please standby. (I do need one; I have 6 DYK credits). ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 12:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment: I know it's a day or two past the 7-day DYK eligibility but it was such a solid
WP:HEYMANN improvement by
Struway2 I really would like to see it celebrated.
Premeditated Chaos QPQ needed. 5x expanded, long enough, two days late, but that's okay. Sourced, hooks check out, no apparent copyvios. --
Usernameunique (
talk) 00:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the QPQ donations
7&6=thirteen! Nice to see these pushed through. --
Usernameunique (
talk) 03:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but I don't see anything about the validity of his contract in the article. The article just talks about his "eligibility".
Yoninah (
talk) 20:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
I was using eligibility / validity as synonymous but it's possible I misunderstood the source or am misusing a technical term. The source states that the other team disputed the eligibility of Boniface's license, which I assumed (possibly wrongly) was Google translate-ese for contract. I may be conflating two different concepts - I don't know a thing about football so I don't know if a license is the same thing as a contract. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 21:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)