The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 06:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
... that Exercise Summer Pulse was a worldwide surge deployment of seven carrier strike groups to test the United States Navy's new Fleet Response Plan?
Created/expanded by
Marcd30319 (
talk). Self nom at 19:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Is anyone going to review this article? I did the heavy lifting by reviewing
Chilean battleship Capitán Prat which got its DYK nom approved and posted.
Marcd30319 (
talk) 00:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Very well laid out and written, reliably and heavily sourced, sources look good. No obvious signs of copyvios etc. A very nice article; this one's good to go.
Prioryman (
talk) 19:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 06:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
... that Exercise Summer Pulse was a worldwide surge deployment of seven carrier strike groups to test the United States Navy's new Fleet Response Plan?
Created/expanded by
Marcd30319 (
talk). Self nom at 19:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Is anyone going to review this article? I did the heavy lifting by reviewing
Chilean battleship Capitán Prat which got its DYK nom approved and posted.
Marcd30319 (
talk) 00:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Very well laid out and written, reliably and heavily sourced, sources look good. No obvious signs of copyvios etc. A very nice article; this one's good to go.
Prioryman (
talk) 19:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)