The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 04:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
The copyright of the first image (right) should be ok for Wikipedia but I suggest that a copyright expert comments on it. The drawing is from the 1940s by Karl Duldig (1902–1986). I presume that the copyright sits with the family and his granddaughter is thus able to release this under a free license. The second image (left) is definitely with an appropriate license. Moved to mainspace by User:HitroMilanese but drafted by 2603:7000:2143:8500:CD4B:DD83:2234:A6CF ( talk). Nominated by Schwede66 ( talk) at 19:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
Way to many citations. Some close paraphrasing that should be copyedited. No preference on the photos --
evrik (
talk) 01:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Also, for what it's worth, the hook is pretty interesting to me. I'd personally reword it like this though:
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 04:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
The copyright of the first image (right) should be ok for Wikipedia but I suggest that a copyright expert comments on it. The drawing is from the 1940s by Karl Duldig (1902–1986). I presume that the copyright sits with the family and his granddaughter is thus able to release this under a free license. The second image (left) is definitely with an appropriate license. Moved to mainspace by User:HitroMilanese but drafted by 2603:7000:2143:8500:CD4B:DD83:2234:A6CF ( talk). Nominated by Schwede66 ( talk) at 19:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
Way to many citations. Some close paraphrasing that should be copyedited. No preference on the photos --
evrik (
talk) 01:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Also, for what it's worth, the hook is pretty interesting to me. I'd personally reword it like this though: