The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Montanabw(talk) 22:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
... that
caterpillars of the Cape lappet moth(pictured) are described as "
gregarious" because they clump together in great numbers for unknown reasons?
5x expanded by
Julia W (
talk). Self nominated at 22:06, 7 November 2013 (UTC).
Nominated five days after creation, and is about 2800 characters, satisfying length and date criteria. QPQ completed. Hook is sourced and of reasonable length. Sources appear
reliable (I'll accept africanmoths.com, given the sources it uses, and that information sourced to it is also sourced to other references). No paraphrasing issues. Good to go.
Mindmatrix 21:17, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
I forgot to review the image, which is CC-BY-SA and satisfies DYK criteria.
Mindmatrix 21:46, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Montanabw(talk) 22:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
... that
caterpillars of the Cape lappet moth(pictured) are described as "
gregarious" because they clump together in great numbers for unknown reasons?
5x expanded by
Julia W (
talk). Self nominated at 22:06, 7 November 2013 (UTC).
Nominated five days after creation, and is about 2800 characters, satisfying length and date criteria. QPQ completed. Hook is sourced and of reasonable length. Sources appear
reliable (I'll accept africanmoths.com, given the sources it uses, and that information sourced to it is also sourced to other references). No paraphrasing issues. Good to go.
Mindmatrix 21:17, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
I forgot to review the image, which is CC-BY-SA and satisfies DYK criteria.
Mindmatrix 21:46, 11 November 2013 (UTC)