The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 11:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
... that Eritha, one of the most significant priestesses in
MycenaeanPylos in c. 1200 BC, was involved in a dispute over the legal status of her
religious holdings?
Created by
Alexikoua (
talk). Self-nominated at 21:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, hook referenced - and v. interesting too; good to go,
Maculosae tegmine lyncis (
talk) 13:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Full review still needed per DYK criteria: overall article sourcing, hook and article neutrality, and close paraphrase/copyvio checks remain undone.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 22:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Good to go. Long enough and new enough relative to the date of this nomination. All non-lead paragraphs have inline citations, QPQ review was performed, checks for copyvio reveals no problems (e.g.
[1]), content of the hook is verified with inline citations to reliable sources in the article. North America1000 11:08, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 11:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
... that Eritha, one of the most significant priestesses in
MycenaeanPylos in c. 1200 BC, was involved in a dispute over the legal status of her
religious holdings?
Created by
Alexikoua (
talk). Self-nominated at 21:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, hook referenced - and v. interesting too; good to go,
Maculosae tegmine lyncis (
talk) 13:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Full review still needed per DYK criteria: overall article sourcing, hook and article neutrality, and close paraphrase/copyvio checks remain undone.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 22:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Good to go. Long enough and new enough relative to the date of this nomination. All non-lead paragraphs have inline citations, QPQ review was performed, checks for copyvio reveals no problems (e.g.
[1]), content of the hook is verified with inline citations to reliable sources in the article. North America1000 11:08, 27 August 2015 (UTC)