The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
... that
Oklahoma state legislator Emily Virgin(pictured) tried to derail a
religious freedom bill by proposing that businesses must publicly post a notice declaring whom they would refuse services to? Source:
[1][2][3]
5x expanded by
Antony-22 (
talk). Self-nominated at 18:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC).
Long enough and new enough in expansion, interesting hook, no less than three citations for it, public domain picture to boot. Looks good to me, though the one concern I'd have is that the hook (and its accompanied sources) might feel a little politically slanted (and I say this not because of personal feelings but to ensure NPOV).
Raymie (
t •
c) 00:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
I really want to put "so-called" in front of "religious freedom bill", but that would be even more POV. I'd like to keep this open to get more discussion on the best way to word this.
Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 03:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
... that
Oklahoma state legislator Emily Virgin(pictured) tried to derail a
religious freedom bill by proposing that businesses must publicly post a notice declaring whom they would refuse services to? Source:
[1][2][3]
5x expanded by
Antony-22 (
talk). Self-nominated at 18:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC).
Long enough and new enough in expansion, interesting hook, no less than three citations for it, public domain picture to boot. Looks good to me, though the one concern I'd have is that the hook (and its accompanied sources) might feel a little politically slanted (and I say this not because of personal feelings but to ensure NPOV).
Raymie (
t •
c) 00:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
I really want to put "so-called" in front of "religious freedom bill", but that would be even more POV. I'd like to keep this open to get more discussion on the best way to word this.
Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 03:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)