The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Montanabw(talk) 03:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
✓ This article is new and was created on 13:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 3845 characters
✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (2.0% confidence;
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
This article is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain, the hook fact has an inline citation, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:30, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Montanabw(talk) 03:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
✓ This article is new and was created on 13:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 3845 characters
✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (2.0% confidence;
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
This article is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain, the hook fact has an inline citation, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:30, 31 July 2016 (UTC)