The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Created by
LavaBaron (
talk). Self-nominated at 20:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC).
per a decision at ANI, this nom requires two reviews
LavaBaron (
talk) 20:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
per that same decision, this nom also requires two QPQs, of which one has been submitted.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 21:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Some issues found.
✓ This article is new and was created on 20:04, 09 July 2016 (UTC)
✗ This article is too short at 1326 characters (the DYK minimum is 1500 characters)
✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
✓ The probability of copyright violation is 9.1%. (
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
No overall issues detected
✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 124 characters
Thanks, DYKReviewBot. I've fixed the length issue now.
LavaBaron (
talk) 00:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
[1 of 2] @
LavaBaron: New enough, long enough, double QPQ present. However, a direct cite for the Italo-Yugoslav Boundary Commission item is not in position at the end of the sentence.
Raymie (
t •
c) 04:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
second review (first needs to be completed to make this go). Support what the bot and Raymie said, + it's long enough now, and the citation is behind the fact. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 07:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Created by
LavaBaron (
talk). Self-nominated at 20:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC).
per a decision at ANI, this nom requires two reviews
LavaBaron (
talk) 20:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
per that same decision, this nom also requires two QPQs, of which one has been submitted.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 21:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Some issues found.
✓ This article is new and was created on 20:04, 09 July 2016 (UTC)
✗ This article is too short at 1326 characters (the DYK minimum is 1500 characters)
✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
✓ The probability of copyright violation is 9.1%. (
confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
No overall issues detected
✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 124 characters
Thanks, DYKReviewBot. I've fixed the length issue now.
LavaBaron (
talk) 00:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
[1 of 2] @
LavaBaron: New enough, long enough, double QPQ present. However, a direct cite for the Italo-Yugoslav Boundary Commission item is not in position at the end of the sentence.
Raymie (
t •
c) 04:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
second review (first needs to be completed to make this go). Support what the bot and Raymie said, + it's long enough now, and the citation is behind the fact. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 07:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)