The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxtontalk 15:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
... that if the double-headed
Romano-Britishdragonesque brooch type represents any real animal, it may be
hares rather than dragons? Source: Johns, Catherine, The Jewellery of Roman Britain: Celtic and classical traditions, p. 152, 1996, UCL Press,
google books
Forgot to include - new article started 16 December
New article, long enough, sourced throughout. Hook is sourced and mentioned in the article. Image displays clearly as a thumbnail and greatly enhances the hook so should be given the image slot.
𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (
talk) 05:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
@
Johnbod and
Ficaia: Interesting article. I found the hook fact in the article and cited - the fact is found at the bottom of page 152. I think our hook does a good job of saying they might be hares. But our readers are likely going to be drawn in by dragons.
Bruxton (
talk) 15:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxtontalk 15:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
... that if the double-headed
Romano-Britishdragonesque brooch type represents any real animal, it may be
hares rather than dragons? Source: Johns, Catherine, The Jewellery of Roman Britain: Celtic and classical traditions, p. 152, 1996, UCL Press,
google books
Forgot to include - new article started 16 December
New article, long enough, sourced throughout. Hook is sourced and mentioned in the article. Image displays clearly as a thumbnail and greatly enhances the hook so should be given the image slot.
𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (
talk) 05:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
@
Johnbod and
Ficaia: Interesting article. I found the hook fact in the article and cited - the fact is found at the bottom of page 152. I think our hook does a good job of saying they might be hares. But our readers are likely going to be drawn in by dragons.
Bruxton (
talk) 15:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)