The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 07:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Article new enough and long enough. No policy issues identified in the article. I do not find the hook in the article though, which only discusses unmated females laying male only eggs.--
Kevmin§ 15:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
@
Kevmin: I have added that to the article now.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 18:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Article is long enough/new enough. No policy issues identified in the prose, no copyright issues. hook is now in the article and sourced to two references, hook checks out. looks good to go.--
Kevmin§ 20:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 07:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Article new enough and long enough. No policy issues identified in the article. I do not find the hook in the article though, which only discusses unmated females laying male only eggs.--
Kevmin§ 15:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
@
Kevmin: I have added that to the article now.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 18:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Article is long enough/new enough. No policy issues identified in the prose, no copyright issues. hook is now in the article and sourced to two references, hook checks out. looks good to go.--
Kevmin§ 20:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)